So, as you may have read, the European Parliament voted today as follows:
#Article13 (upload filters)
Passed: 366 for, 297 against
#Article 11 (link tax)
Passed: 393 for, 279 against
(They also banned people taking unofficial video or photos of sports events ⚽ 🚫 📸 )
So, close but not enough 😟
However, this was not the final vote. There will be more negotiations and a final vote in spring of 2019.
I would advise following Julia Reda, one of the good MEPs:
@switchingsocial Also maybe hounding the crap out of every MEP who voted in favour of this shit constantly from this day onward?
I don't think that would help :( The pro-filter MEPs already think the publishing industry is their best friend, attacking them would simply reinforce that view.
We need to vote them out of office, and support the anti-filter MEPs. The vote split the parliament down the middle, almost half the parliament voted against Art11 and Art13. The sports proposal passed by just one vote.
As I posted above, Julia Reda is one of the leading figures we need to back:
Most importantly, we need to (politely) get the unsure MEPs on our side. Many of them are not aware of how the internet works, and genuinely think fair filters are possible.
If they could be educated on the drawbacks, maybe the unsure ones might swing to our side.
@switchingsocial It's almost like.. Everyone who said the EU was a wonderful idea and that the UK was stupid for leaving.. Were wrong. Hope the EU crashes and burns
No one has any idea at all what the UK will do instead.
Considering Britain's much weaker negotiating position outside any trading blocs, it is likely that new trade deals will impose much worse terms than the UK currently enjoys. These could include e.g. the US wanting compulsory copyright protection through filters etc.
The UK will no longer have the leverage it had as part of the EU (or EFTA or the Empire before that). Britain will have to take whatever it can get.
It's not about being pathetic, it's about being part of a huge rich trading bloc.
The EU represents 450 million rich first world consumers, the US represents 330 million, so they both have enormous bargaining power.
The UK only has 65 million people, that's not even a quarter of what those blocs have. It simply isn't big enough to throw its weight around in the same way.
It's the same reason supermarket chains have much cheaper food than small independent shops.
@switchingsocial Shit, we can't let it through.
@switchingsocial aw shit. Well I guess I'm a Lexiter now
mastodon.at is a microblogging site that federates with most instances on the Fediverse.